Scaling Laravel Using AWS Elastic Beanstalk Part 1: Setting up Laravel


Our new product Mergebot is getting very close to the stage of being ready to put in the hands of our beta testers. As such I went through the process recently of setting up the Laravel app on our production architecture. We decided early on to go with Amazon Web Services (AWS), specifically Elastic Beanstalk, to host the app as it has a solid reputation for being a decent hosting provider and also offers us everything we need in terms of infrastructure (e.g. load balancers, auto scaling, relational database, custom VPC etc.).

When I started out I was surprised to find that there seemed to be quite a lack of public information available about setting up Laravel on Elastic Beanstalk. I had assumed that there must be plenty of companies running large scale apps using Laravel and, given the popularity of AWS and Elastic Beanstalk, I expected there to be quite a bit written about the process of setting it up. For once Google didn’t give me much concrete advice, and certainly not anything that was in-date (i.e. setting up Laravel 5.x apps on the current Elastic Beanstalk platform).

So in this short series I’m going to go through the process of setting up a Laravel 5.3 app on AWS Elastic Beanstalk. I’m also going to cover setting up some supporting services that large scale Laravel apps would require: setting up an external RDS MySQL database, setting up Redis on ElastiCache and configuring everything securely on a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). A rough outline for this series, is as follows:

  1. Set up Laravel for a horizontally auto scaling architecture
  2. Set up supporting services such as VPC, RDS and ElastiCache
  3. Set up Elastic Beanstalk app and worker environments

Horizontal Scaling

The first thing we need to do is get our Laravel app ready to work on an architecture designed to scale horizontally. The idea with horizontal scaling is that when your server is struggling to cope with the load you add a new duplicate of the server to your cluster of servers, and spread the load evenly over the whole cluster of servers using a Load Balancer. This type of architecture is common for high demand apps and although scaling vertically (increasing the size/power of your server) may be fine early on, if demand continues to grow you will have no choice but to scale horizontally. Some of the advantages of horizontal auto scaling include:

  • The flexibility to increase/decrease the load capacity of your app without any downtime (as opposed to vertical scaling)
  • Reasonable affordability (i.e. you only pay for what you need, automatically increasing/decreasing as required)
  • Protection against a single point of failure (e.g. health checks can automatically remove degraded servers and add new ones)
  • Rolling updates and deployments (e.g. upgrade your servers in batches to avoid downtime)
  • Potentially infinite possibility for scaling up

To gain all of the benefits of horizontal scaling, your app needs to be thoroughly decoupled so that resources can be shared across all of the servers in your cluster, whether you have 1 or 100 servers. What does it mean to decouple your app?

As an example, consider an app that allows you to login and upload photos. With a single server, the user session and any photos the user uploads can be stored on the server file system. However, with a horizontally scaled app you might have many app servers that need shared access to the user session and uploaded photos. So you need to decouple the file system from the app server. This is normally done by either using a shared storage volume or storing the data in an external service that can be accessed by all the servers in the cluster (e.g. a database or Redis cache).

We are going to make some tweaks to our Laravel app to make sure the app is properly decoupled and ready for horizontal auto scaling.

Decoupling Laravel

Thankfully Laravel comes with built-in features that make it relatively easy to decouple. These include:

In this series we are going to copy the architecture that we currently employ in Mergebot, namely storing files in S3 instead of the local file system (except for temporary or development files), storing session data in the database, using Redis for cache data, and using Elastic Beanstalk’s worker environment (which uses SQS) to handle queues (more on this later).

External File System

In Mergebot we only use the local file system for temporary files and storing files we need in our development environment. In our production environments we store files on S3, which is simply done in Laravel. As per Laravel filesystem docs we need to install the league/flysystem-aws-s3-v3 package, then configure our S3 settings in config/filesystems.php:

'disks' => [

    // ...
    's3' => [
        'driver' => 's3',
        'key'    => env('AWS_S3_KEY'),
        'secret' => env('AWS_S3_SECRET'),
        'region' => env('AWS_S3_REGION', 'us-east-1'),
        'bucket' => env('AWS_S3_BUCKET', 'mergebot-' . env('APP_ENV')),


We can then input the correct environment variables in our .env file when developing locally, or set the environment variables in Elastic Beanstalk (we’ll deal with this later in the series).

This allows us to use an “s3” disk in Laravel. For example:

$s3 = Storage::disk('s3');
$s3->put('example-file.sql.gz', $fileContents);

Database Sessions

Storing sessions in the database is also well documented in the Laravel session docs. Simply run an artisan command to generate the table migration needed for the database, then run the migration:

php artisan session:table
php artisan migrate

Then we can change the default session driver in config/session.php or in your .env/environment variables. Because all of our environments use the same config I have just changed the default in config/session.php:

'driver' => env('SESSION_DRIVER', 'database'),

Redis Cache

Changing the cache to use Redis is a very similar process to changing the session driver. As per the Laravel cache docs we need to install the predis/predis package then change the default driver in config/cache.php:

'default' => env('CACHE_DRIVER', 'redis'),

The Redis connection info can be configured in config/database.php and we need to tweak it a bit so that the default values can be overridden by environment variables:

'redis' => [

    'cluster' => env('REDIS_CLUSTER', false),

    'default' => [
        'host'     => env('REDIS_HOST', 'localhost'),
        'password' => env('REDIS_PASSWORD', null),
        'port'     => env('REDIS_PORT', 6379),
        'database' => 0,


For local development I recommend using the Homestead VM as it comes with Redis pre-installed and means you don’t need to install it on your local machine.

SQS Queues

The final part of decoupling that needs to be done is a bit more complex. Setting up Laravel to use SQS queues via the docs is simple enough. Install the aws/aws-sdk-php package and set up environment variables in the config/queue.php file similar to what we’ve done previously:

'default' => env('QUEUE_DRIVER', 'sqs'),

'connections' => [

    'sqs' => [
        'driver' => 'sqs',
        'key'    => env('AWS_SQS_KEY'),
        'secret' => env('AWS_SQS_SECRET'),
        'prefix' => env('AWS_SQS_PREFIX'),
        'queue'  => env('AWS_SQS_QUEUE'),
        'region' => env('AWS_SQS_REGION', 'us-east-1'),


Normally at this point you would run a queue listener php artisan queue:work in a process manager like Supervisor to make sure the queue listener is always running. However Elastic Beanstalk does things a bit differently.

Elastic Beanstalk has the concept of worker environments which are separate from the normal web environments and designed specifically for dealing with jobs that have been added to an SQS queue. Servers in worker environments come with Amazon’s own SQS daemon to deal with incoming messages from an SQS queue, which is nice because it means we don’t have to set up our own daemon to deal with Laravel’s built-in queue listener. However, Laravel is not built to work with the SQS daemon so we need to install an extra package to get things working.

Image credit:

Image credit: Denis Mysenko

While we could manually implement an interface for the SQS daemon, I found that this laravel-aws-worker package from Denis Mysenko seems to work well. The SQS daemon is designed to POST an incoming message from the SQS queue to our app (rather than the listener fetching a message from the queue as Laravel’s built-in listener does). The laravel-aws-worker package adds an extra /worker/queue path to our app to handle these incoming messages from the SQS daemon, and hands them off to Laravel to be processed. By default the SQS daemon will POST messages to the base path / but we will change that in the configuration later when we set up the environment in Elastic Beanstalk.

Elastic Beanstalk Quirks

Now that our Laravel app is decoupled there are a few final tweaks we need to make to make sure our app works properly on Elastic Beanstalk.


Another aspect of Elastic Beanstalk that the laravel-aws-worker handles is dealing with cron jobs and task scheduling in Laravel. We can’t have every server in our cluster configured with the same cron because each cron job would then be triggered multiple times when we only want it triggered once. Elastic Beanstalk deals with this automatically by allowing us to specify a cron.yaml file in our worker environment which handles all of the cron complexities for us (again by POSTing a request to the specified endpoint).

The laravel-aws-worker package adds a second /worker/schedule path to our app so that we can configure our cron.yaml like this:

version: 1
 - name: "schedule"
   url: "/worker/schedule"
   schedule: "* * * * *"

Now the worker environment will POST to /worker/schedule every minute and the laravel-aws-worker package will offload this to the Laravel scheduler.

Have a read of this blog post by Denis if you want to know more about how the laravel-aws-worker package works.


One other issue you will find is that when you are behind a load balancer (or any kind of reverse proxy) things like sessions, redirects, URL generation etc. might break because the server isn’t receiving the traffic directly but instead receiving traffic from the load balancer. The load balancer might know your site is at the domain but the server receives traffic from the load balancer which might have some random hostname or IP. Thankfully AWS helps us out here by sending the correct info via X-Forwarded headers. However Laravel is not configured to handle these X-Forwarded headers so we need to install a package to tell Laravel what to do here.

This TrustedProxy package by Chris Fidao seems to work well. You simply need to install the fideloper/proxy package, run through the set up and tweak the generated config/trustedproxy.php config to allow the correct proxies:

return [

    'proxies' => '*',

    'headers' => [
        \Illuminate\Http\Request::HEADER_CLIENT_IP    => 'X_FORWARDED_FOR',
        \Illuminate\Http\Request::HEADER_CLIENT_HOST  => 'X_FORWARDED_HOST',
        \Illuminate\Http\Request::HEADER_CLIENT_PROTO => 'X_FORWARDED_PROTO',
        \Illuminate\Http\Request::HEADER_CLIENT_PORT  => 'X_FORWARDED_PORT',


AWS does not document their load balancer IP addresses (as they are constantly changing), and so we must trust all possible addresses (*). The default headers will work fine here.


At this stage our Laravel app should be suitable to be deployed on AWS Elastic Beanstalk and auto scaled horizontally. In the next article we will look at setting up supporting services in AWS such as a VPC, a Redis ElastiCache and our RDS MySQL database.

Have you ever hosted Laravel on Elastic Beanstalk? Do you have any experience scaling Laravel? Have you ever used Elastic Beanstalk or auto scaling on a different project? Let us know in the comments.

About the Author

Gilbert Pellegrom

Gilbert loves to build software. From jQuery scripts to WordPress plugins to full blown SaaS apps, Gilbert has been creating elegant software his whole career. Probably most famous for creating the Nivo Slider.

  • eric

    will you release more articles? is there a reason why not manually config ec2, rds, etc vs elastix beanstalk? read somewhere in forum that beanstalk is for beginners. Is it really true?

    • Yes Eric this is the first post in a short series of posts. It is true that you could manually configure the same setup using AWS services, but Elastic Beanstalk makes it much easier to manage. I would say that Elastic Beanstalk offers convenience more than being for “beginners”.

      • eric

        nice, wait for more articles from you soon 🙂

  • Rick

    This article is great, and has really inspired me to start picking up Laravel. Looking forward to the next in the series! @Gilbert – Do you have any recommended resources for learning Laravel?

  • Good article @Gilbert. I’ve used EB to deploy docker apps before. Rails and craftcms apps. But good to see an article go into more detail on the intricacies of it all.

    • Thanks Jack. I’ve found the intricacies/quirks of EB are the parts that aren’t very well documented, hence trying to share some of my learning in this short series.

  • fajri abdillah

    Great article, but I have some question about sqs queue, what about the performance between aws worker environment vs laravel queue + supervisor (i.e 60 supervisor numprocs on m4.large) ? Thanks

    • We’ll get more into this later in the series, but my initial tests show the AWS worker environment dameon being much faster than laravel queue + supervisor.

  • Matt Read

    This article is exactly what I’ve been looking for. Thank you for going through this and I can’t wait for future articles!

    Are you also planning on showing how to setup the EC2 instances? — mainly I was hoping to use a platform with PHP 7.0 and Nginx but have only seen it setup with Apache.. just wondering if anyone else out there has been able to hook this up.

    • Thanks Matt. Elastic Beanstalk takes care of the server provisioning for you (it uses Apache not Nginx I’m afraid) so I won’t really be going into that.

      • Matt Read

        ah thanks!

        I guess I was more curious.. when you were setting this up, are you using the Apache & PHP 7.0 (or 5.6) platform for your web server?

        • Ramesh Kumar

          You can use php environment with nginx, i have done that couple of months back and wrote a blog post about it:

  • Jaymie Thomas

    Very welcome here too – look forward to the other parts of this series. Perhaps AWS could point to this too, as it’s more useful than their docs in some places :oP

  • Guillaume Bourdages

    Awesome article. I am still a bit confused though, so basically if I understand it right, to deploy the application we will need to 2 AWS beanstalk environment, the web server environment (for job and cron) and the worker environment, I am right?

    • Thanks Guillaume. Yes that is correct (although the worker environment handles the jobs and cron).

      • Guillaume Bourdages

        I am not familiar with setting up a worker environment but I guess we should disable all routes except the worker routes in this environment, right?

        • fajri abdillah

          This is our current implementation of aws worker tier

        • You can disable routes if you like but normally the worker servers aren’t accessible publically so it probably won’t make much difference.

          • Guillaume Bourdages

            Awesome thanks probably my misunderstanding of the worker environment which confused me. Looking forward to part 2!

  • Skovmand

    Thanks for this article, Gilbert. I can’t wait until your next one!

    Also could you comment on the security setup of EBS? As I see it, the firewalls are sensibly configured, but are there any extra configuration that should be done to secure the infrastructure?

    • We’ll talk a bit about security and using VPCs in the next article.

      • Skovmand

        Thank you.

  • A.D. Edsall

    Wow, great job sir. Would have taken me hours to go through everything and figure this out, but I decided to Google it first, and.. fantastic. Thank you for your contribution.

  • Jonathan A

    What about the “.elasticbanstalk” directory? If I am using the same codebase for a web environment and a worker environment, would the fact that the config.yml in there is pointing to a certain environment?

    • If you have an “.elasticbanstalk” directory it should be added to your .gitignore and not stored in your code repository. Later we’ll look at using “ebextensions” and having custom configs for different environments.

      If you have a config.yml it should just be ignored by the web environment and only used by the worker environment.

      • Jonathan A

        It might store it in gitignore, but doesnt it still send it when you do the “eb deploy … ” ? Also How would you get the web environment to ignore the config.yml?

        • Yes it still send it if you do “eb deploy”. We use an app called to deploy our app automatically so we don’t have to do it manually which resolves this issue.

          As far as I’m aware the web environment should ignore cron.yml by default.

          • Ramesh Kumar

            .elasticbeanstalk never get bundled. When you run ‘eb deploy’ it zips the content of current directory except .elasticbeanstalk but it reads the config from there for metadata information and uploads the zip to respective s3 bucket of that region created during first time creation of elasticbeanstalk environment or very first elasticbeanstalk environment and then gets downloaded on your ec2 instances and then get extracted at right location(doc root). However, there are couple of more steps happens in b/w.

  • José Enrique Martorano

    Hello one question

    Is it possible to configure multiple “.ebextensions” for multiple environments without creating two branches in git?


    • Christian Taylor

      Good question. Did you figure out a way of doing this?

    • Ramesh Kumar

      I don’t think it’s possible… I ended up using branches

  • Raju Prasad

    great. complete info at one place.

  • Skovmand

    I have tried setting my Laravel website up in Elastic Beanstalk now, and I’m having issues with Laravel not generating https-routes by default, even though the site is served over HTTPS and using the fideloper/trustedproxy package. Do your links become HTTPS by default?

  • Ramesh Kumar

    This works but with single redis not but does not work with redis cluster or elasticcache clustered mode…
    Is anyone able to make it work with database settings mentioned above in article, mentioning again for the reference though:

    ‘redis’ => [

    ‘cluster’ => env(‘REDIS_CLUSTER’, false),

    ‘default’ => [
    ‘host’ => env(‘REDIS_HOST’, ‘localhost’),
    ‘password’ => env(‘REDIS_PASSWORD’, null),
    ‘port’ => env(‘REDIS_PORT’, 6379),
    ‘database’ => 0,

    REDIS_CLUSTER is set to true and other required values are provided by .env file.